Which action should be part of incident audit trails according to DoDI 8500.01?

When considering incident audit trails as outlined in DoDI 8500.01, the focus is on maintaining a thorough record of events that could indicate potential insider threats or security incidents. Documenting attempts at self-recovery plays a critical role in this context.

This action provides insights into how users are responding to incidents, which could reflect a greater concern for their actions or could indicate suspicious behavior if they are attempting to regain access to systems without following proper protocols. Capturing these attempts helps in understanding the context of an incident, monitoring user behavior, and identifying patterns that may warrant further investigation.

In contrast, other choices may not directly contribute to the same breadth of insight into user behavior regarding potential security incidents in the context of insider threats. For instance, reporting user login frequencies primarily provides information about access patterns but does not indicate intentions or actions taken during incidents. Recording program changes offers valuable information regarding system integrity but does not touch on user behavior during incident responses. Verifying hardware updates is more aligned with operational integrity rather than directly addressing incidents or potential insider threats.

Overall, documenting attempts at self-recovery stands out as a pivotal action in facilitating a better understanding of users' responses during security incidents, making it a vital component of incident audit trails.